Get cpu temps in rainmeter3/16/2024 In either case, what the display shows should be accurate and configurable for the end user.Step 3: Copy and paste the following script into a new Rainmeter skin file, adjusting the settings as needed If it's going to use logical cores, then the briefest way to note that is to use "thread1:", unless you think spelling out "Logical core1:" makes sense. If it's going to show Physical cores, then "core1:" makes sense, but the display should only show 12 cores. The CPU gadget shows "core1:" and "core2:" etc, but doesn't denote if it's a physical core or a logical one. Since SMT was invented, I have NEVER heard a tech call a CPU "4 physical cores and 8 logical cores", they ALWAYS say "4 cores, 8 threads". So, if you have a CPU with 4 physical cores that has 8 logical cores, the CPU is capable of running 8 simultaneous threads. Only one thread can run on any logical core. It is impossible for those numbers to disagree. Duplicating the Core 0 temperature by showing the exact same data twice (Logical core 1 and logical core 2) is redundant and useless. This is because both are showing the temperature of physical core 0. Looking at physical core 0, logical core 1 and logical core 2 will show the same temperature. Only a physical core can have a temperature. I think we're scrambling around terminology here. Windows knows exactly how many physical cores this machine has. SilverAzide wrote: ↑ October 11th, 2021, 8:41 pm You can whitelist it if you want, up to you. I'd point out that these skins have been using RainFile for years, and RainFile has been around since 2015 or so, so I have no idea why MS is suddenly having issues with this. For some reason MS Defender is triggering on this skin due to inclusion of RainFile.exe. I'm getting a virus warning from Windows defender when I download either 1.8.0 or 1.8.1.any ideas what is going on?Ĭontainerfile: C:\Users\sdimm\Downloads\ModernGadgets_v1.8.0.rmskinįile: C:\Users\sdimm\Downloads\ModernGadgets_v1.8.0.rmskin| Sherminator98 wrote: ↑ October 12th, 2021, 3:03 am A toggle is not going to help you here, as you are showing two different things: percent usage for logical cores and temps for physical cores. For AMD CPUs that can report per-core temps, and for Intel CPUs, the skin should report temps in pairs (each pair of cores will show the same temp). Your skin appears off somehow, it should not show any zero values (this could be related to a HWiNFO reporting bug in a recent 7.x release, where some cores on AMD CPUs are missing). Each pair of logical cores should show the same temperature, corresponding to the physical core. In a separate issue, the reason you are not seeing all the temps is that there is something misconfigured in the skin. there are 24 logical cores, ordered 0 to 23. Look at the Performance Counters (Processor > % Processor Time), which is where Rainmeter (and HWiNFO) get the usage data. Even HWiNFO shows you the 24 threads (or logical cores) for the percent usage, and you won't get Windows or HWiNFO to turn them into just 12 no matter how much you'd like them to. The fact remains that Windows is seeing logical cores, and the usage percentages are reported by logical core. Even HWiNFO isn't going to make any difference. Sorry, none of those arguments is relevant. Anything else just doesn't make logical sense. To satisfy both camps, a toggle would be a great compromise. The gadget should read "threads" if it's going to show 24 entries and forgo showing temperatures for 1/2 of the threads, or it should retain the correct term "cores" and only show actual real cores and their temperatures. I guess what I'm getting at is that the gadget is confusing for someone who is a true computer nerd afflicted with a bit of ADHD. You can't show a temperature for a thread, because a thread is not hardware and does not have an associated temperature. Even Rainmeter/MGadgets understands the difference, showing temperatures for the cores, but not the threads, which is the whole purpose of my issue. HWINFO running under Windows see's cores and threads separately. Windows sees threads as they are, virtual components of cores. Brellyn wrote: ↑ October 11th, 2021, 8:00 pm
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |